Americas Role in the Cuban Revolution :: American America History

Americas Role in the Cuban Revolution The revolution in Cuba was not a result of economic deprivation, norbecause of high expectations in the economy, it was the political factorsand expectations which evoked the civilians to revolt. The Cuban economywas moving forward at the time in advance the rebellion but the dominantinfluence of the sugar industry make the economy assymetrical andencouraged no dynamic industrial sector. Because of the dependency onsugar, the unemployment rate ranged between 16 and 20% rising and droppingwith sugar prices, ebbing and flowing as the season changed. The rural net income levels were incredibly unsteady and unpredictable the standard ofliving was low. Dependance on the sugar industry did not retard the economyof Cuba, just the contend of its workers. It was the leaders of the nationwho reaped profit from this dependance, and it was the leaders of thenation who insisted on retentiveness the nation the way it was. By the mid1950s, however, the centre of attention class had grow to 33% of the population. Democracy, as we know it, broke down the large middle class did notassert democratic leadership, in that location was no neighborly militancy in the workingclass ranks, and the people found sanctify preferable to disarray. Batistacould no longer legitimize his regime. Failure in the elections of 1954showed the dissatisfy of the people, and failure in communications with theUnited States illustrated its discontent. Finally, opposing forcesconfronted Batistas power there were street protests, confrontationswith the police, assault, sabotage, and urban violence. This began therevolution in Cuba. America, with its stubborn ideas and misjudgements of character, forcedCastro to handle to the Soviets for alliance and aid. When Castro visitedthe United States in April, 1959, there were different respectedindividuals prop different views of him and his future actions. Nixonbelieved Castro to be naive, some others thought him a have change fromBatista, still others called him an immature but effective leader, withouta well(p) formed view of how to lead a revolutionary movement and not overlyconcerned with abstract of philosophical matters (p. 55). Why, then, didthe United States impress nit-picky ideals wish there should not becommunists in the Army or in labor, or Cubas approach to the Batistatrials is totally unacceptable, too casual, too unconcerned on thisforming leader? Castro was like an inexperienced murderer with a gun inhis hand any rustle in the background could qualify off his nervous trigger