Deontological Moral Theory Essay -- essays research papers

Deontological chaste possible implement is a Non-Consequentialist moral system. While consequentialists believe the ends forever and a day justify the means, deontologists assert that the rightness of an action is not simply subject on maximizing the expert, if that action goes against what is considered moral. It is the inherent nature of the act just that determines its ethical standing. For example, imagine a situation where there be quaternity critical condition patients in a hospital who each look at a different organ in order to survive. Then, a rosy man comes to the doctors office for a routine check-up. tally to consequentialism, not deontology, the doctor should and must sacrifice that unrivaledness man in order to save for others. Thus, maximizing the good. However, deontological belief contests this way of thinking by contending that it is immoral to kill the innocent despite the fact one would be maximizing the good. Deontologists create concrete distinct ions between what is moral right and misuse and use their morals as a guide when making choices. Deontologists cede restrictions against maximizing the good when it interferes with moral standards. Also, since deontologists place a high cherish on the individual, in some instances it is permissible not to maximize the good when it is detrimental to yourself. For example, one does not need to impoverish oneself to the point of clumsiness simply to satisfy ones moral obligations. Deontology can be looked at as a generally flexible moral possible action that allows for self-interpretation but like all others theories studied thus far, there atomic number 18 arguments one can make against its reasoning.One objection to deontological moral scheme is that the surmisal yields only absolutes and cannot always justify its standpoints. Actions are either categorize as right or wrong with no allowance for a gray area. Furtherto a greater extent, the strict guidelines tend to conflict with commonly accepted actions. For example, fictionalization is always considered morally wrong--even a white lie. Therefore, one must not lie even if it does more good. In our society although individuals accept cunning as being morally wrong, white lies have become an exception. unaccompanied having absolutes creates a theory that is extremely hard only to abide by, curiously when deontological though permits you from making a choice when that choice would clearly be optimal... ...individual beliefs, one can form their own educated opinions regarding what kind of action he should take. Morals are also not always concrete. Relativist thought contends each group of people may contain different morals. From that opinion, one may assert that morals themselves are not absolute. Still, deontological moral theory provides a strong base for making correct decisions. There are few realistic exceptions to the theory and one can easily break when an exception is to be made. So, knowin g that deontology creates a valuable beginning for a strong moral theory, one can simply interpret the theory less strictly. Deontology can be a quite appealing theory when not taken so literally. Clearly, one has morals they consider more important than others. If the theory is adjust for this idea, the notion of moral dilemmas is eliminated and one would be allowed to lie if it saved lives. Deontology when looked at loosely is simply a moral theory that says we have morals and we need to consider them when making decisions. Therefore, one may conclude that the overall principles or deontology are correct and that this moral theory should not be dismissed.