Women, Men And Competition :: essays research papers

Wo hands, Men and Competition     Loudly and often, women collect a firm stand they dont like disputation, and thatcompetition is an act of aggression. Ironically, however, competition asaggression is requisite in a society where men must compete for the aidof women. Women encourage this. Every time they passively wait for men to takethe initiative, or reject nurturing men in deference to domineering men, they gravel the dynamic of dominance. Ignoring this, pop-feminists contendcompetition is the capitalization of aggression, and men do it to the mischiefof all.     Does this mean fighting for domination is the only air to compete? Thatcompetition is solely a product of masculine socialization and something we cando without? Masculine socialization has nothing to do with it. In one way oranother, all living things compete, because wanting creates competition. Youwant to live, so you project heavys or services to others in exchange for the goodsand services you need to survive. The best the goods and services you offer,the more you can get in exchange, and the better you give be able to live.     To live well, you make your "stuff" as good as possible relative to whatyour "competition" offers. That is the essence of competition in a free market.It respects the rights of others, and everybody wins because it works through and throughvalidation rather than domination.     Competition as validation is the process by which the efficacy of ideas,knowledge, and products is formalise by consumers. They choose what they valuemost. To the extent our economy encourages winning through validation, it works.Most women, however, encourage competition through domination by ignoringcooperative, nurturing men to give their love and sex to domineering, "virile"men. Whats more, women compete, and they compete to win. This is especially unmixed in womens response t o the invention of the rubber condom.     Prior to the 1870s, prostitution in Europe was prevalent. Victorianladies distaste for sex encouraged "an explosive attach in prostitution" thatcaused "an epidemic spread of venereal disease, and a pathologic taste formasochism." Then, women began to compete sexually, and prostitution had to go.They began to compete with prostitutes for their husbands continuing attentions.     What changed? Men started victimisation rubber condoms. This gave women theoption of enjoying sex without risking pregnancy, and that meant women nowviewed prostitutes as sexual competitors. Subsequently, they demanded lawsprohibiting prostitution, belying the legend that women dont compete. Women saythis is mens fault. That men have forced the necessity of sexual competitionupon women and that, left to themselves, women hearken to a more cooperativeagenda. provided the facts do not support this contention.