Police and Lethal Force Essay Example for Free

practice of law and Lethal Force EssayPolice work entails expectedly legion(predicate) opportunities for misuse of authority or the uppity use of jampack which is not necessary when in the line of duty (Strack 1994 ACLU 1991). This is a master(a) unloosen that concerns policing and the grave and abusive conduct of men in equivalent whether they ar in the United States or elsewhere in the world (Police culture and behavior 2008). There are various factors that are usually pointed at whenever this happens police officers already in the brink of burn out are a primary reason. However, the mental or psychological state of an officer is usually in question if this use of fatal effect occurs. Why is this considered an issue? It is a given usually, that a police officer is knowledgeable of the force continuum (www.policetest.info) which is a kind of scale that guides an officer in graduated level with which what method or admission will he resort to under any given circums tance (see appendix A). This shows that by his mere(prenominal) presence alone, the officer realizes, the suspect may be alerted or threatened and succeeding responses by the deuce individuals (i.e., if it involves two people only) are then again graded and evaluated by the officer according to the force continuum.Precisely because reports are aplenty concerning police brutality which happens when a suspect is frisked and/or confronted with a criminal occupation and many of these instances that the persons of interest or suspects do not even have any weapon of sorts with them, nor were they in the position challenging the person in authority. The case of Rodney King in 1991 became a platform for many of these reforms that were made eventually, to respond to public clamor for entirelyice regarding perpetrators the like of which Rodney King had suffered from. Studies show that in well-nigh organizations where reforms have been initiated, what was important was the regular monitor ing of the activities of police officers ensures that these men minimize their propensity to exercise the might of employing lethal or deadly force against any citizen or any suspect unless merited. This is not just to safeguard any suspect or citizen whether they are coming from the expected marginalized groups where the most likely victims are men of color, older or aging citizens, women and children but even these same men in uniform from their own tendencies to act with anger or rage and resort to these means (ACLU 1991).To serve and to protect stooge mean both ways when interpreted in the light of these reforms it means serving and protecting the men themselves who are employed to do the same to the general public. Affirming their code of ethics now and then may be a small thing but it is still a major part of reminding officers why they are in the force and the accountability that is necessary in the deterrence of themselves committing a crime needlessly. appendix A The Forc e ContinuumMore ForceDeadly ForceLess LethalPepper Spray, Baton, Taser desolate Hand ControlVerbal CommandsLess ForceOfficer PresenceSource http//www.policetest.info/FORCE_CONTINUUM_POLICE_USE_OF_FORCE.htmWorks citedStrack, Lorr M.1994. reputation profile of police candidates. Journal of Clinical Psychology 50(2)200-7. www.pubmed.gov._____ Police culture and behavior. Accessed borderland 12, 2008. file///G/A%20POLICE/Police%20Culture.htmAmerican Civil Liberties Union. On the Line Police Brutality and its remedies. New York. April 1991. Retrieved March 12, 2008 http//www.aclu.org/police/gen/14614pub19971201.html_______ Police Oral Boards and Use of Force Continuum. Retrieved March 12, 2008 http//www.policetest.info/FORCE_CONTINUUM_POLICE_USE_OF_FORCE.htm